Arizona AG: Supreme Court 'woefully misguided' in LGBTQ+ rights opinion
U.S. Supreme Court
(AP)
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said last week’s U.S. Supreme Court decision that affects LGBTQ+ rights was “woefully misguided,” and she will continue to enforce the state’s law regarding discrimination.
The high court ruled 6-3 that a Colorado web designer who wants to design wedding websites can refuse to work with same-sex couples based on her religious beliefs.
The court, Mayes said, “has decided that businesses open to the public may, in certain circumstances, discriminate against LGBTQ+ Americans.
You must be a member to read this story.
Join our family of readers for as little as $1 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.
For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.
Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.
Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
Register to comment
Click here create a free account for posting comments.
Note that free accounts do not include access to premium content on this site.
I am anchor
Government
Arizona AG: Supreme Court 'woefully misguided' in LGBTQ+ rights opinion
(AP)
U.S. Supreme Court
Posted
INDEPENDENT NEWSMEDIA
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said last week’s U.S. Supreme Court decision that affects LGBTQ+ rights was “woefully misguided,” and she will continue to enforce the state’s law regarding discrimination.
The high court ruled 6-3 that a Colorado web designer who wants to design wedding websites can refuse to work with same-sex couples based on her religious beliefs.
The court, Mayes said, “has decided that businesses open to the public may, in certain circumstances, discriminate against LGBTQ+ Americans.
“While my office is still reviewing the decision to determine its effects, I agree with Justice (Sonia) Sotomayor – the idea that the Constitution gives businesses the right to discriminate is ‘profoundly wrong.’"
Arizona law prohibits discrimination in places of public accommodation, including discrimination because of sexual orientation and gender identity, according to the Arizona Attorney General’s Office.
“If any Arizonan believes that they have been the victim of discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), national origin or ancestry in a place of public accommodation, they should file a complaint with my office,” Mayes said.
“I will continue to enforce Arizona's public accommodation law to its fullest extent.”
We’d like to invite our readers to submit their civil comments, pro or con, on this issue. Email AZOpinions@iniusa.org.