Log in

Subscriber Exclusive

Deer Valley Unified agrees to delay boundary changes vote

‘Significant number’ of parents voice opposition; issue will be taken up again this month

Posted 11/10/21

An effort to delay the vote on the proposed boundary changes within Deer Valley Unified School District was successful Tuesday.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Subscriber Exclusive

Deer Valley Unified agrees to delay boundary changes vote

‘Significant number’ of parents voice opposition; issue will be taken up again this month

Posted

An effort to delay the vote on the proposed boundary changes within Deer Valley Unified School District was successful Tuesday.

The governing board had a scheduled voting item on its Nov. 9 agenda to consider proposed growth-driven changes that would impact neighborhoods and school communities in the northern sections of Peoria, Glendale and Phoenix following months of discussions.

This past week, a movement to delay the vote in the hopes of focusing on other boundary options gained momentum. As a result, the board agreed Tuesday night to table the vote and revisit the issue at a special meeting scheduled for Tuesday, Nov. 30. The board hadn’t been scheduled to meet again until Dec. 14.

“We do know that they’re expecting growth, but there’s also an impact on the students who have just adjusted to that area,” said James Schneider, an Aloravita neighborhood resident whose children attend Terramar Elementary, 7000 W. Happy Valley Road, Peoria, which figures to be impacted. Schneider was among the parents who addressed the board Tuesday night.

A parent-sponsored petition gained 247 signatures as of Wednesday afternoon in the week since it was first posted online.

It wasn’t just the recent petition. Jim Migliorino, the district’s Deputy Superintendent of Fiscal & Business Services, said Tuesday night that almost half of the 50 emails the district received about the boundary proposals were related to the Aloravita neighborhood “not wanting to be reassigned to the Las Brisas and Hillcrest Middle School designation.”

The one-square mile Peoria neighborhood is bordered by Jomax Road to the south, 75th Avenue to the west and 67th Avenue to the east. He characterized the representation of feedback against the proposal from that neighborhood “a significant number.”

The delayed vote won’t necessarily stop the proposed changes, which are driven mainly by current and expected growth in that section of the DVUSD. This past summer the district reported projected school capacities for the 2021-22 academic year, and Stetson Hills (105%) and Terramar (101.3%) were projected to be over capacity, while West Wing (95.1%) and Las Brisas (92.6%) were approaching capacity.

Superintendent Dr. Curtis Finch cautioned against delaying the vote from a logistical standpoint.

“It would just disrupt the timing for all of the other decisions that need to be made,” he said Tuesday night. “It certainly could be a detriment to our parents because the open enrollment priority that we provide to parents is if they submit their open enrollment by December.”

Although Deputy Superintendent of Human Resources Jenna Moffitt said the system could manage the “flexible process,” she also cautioned that delaying the decision would impact other district resources. The date for first priority consideration under open enrollment is Monday, Dec. 6, and that process involves developing budget sheets and staffing allocations for the 2022-23 academic year, which can change as months go by.

While the process continues, she advised parents to file for an open enrollment application as soon as possible. Those applications can be withdrawn at a later date.

Open enrollment applications are available here.