Goldwater Institute, Gilbert and school districts battle over what is electioneering
By Tom Blodgett and Janet Perez | Independent Newsmedia
Posted 10/18/24
The Goldwater Institute is seeking an investigation into one local town and several school districts regarding how they are marketing their election propositions as potentially being illegal.
…
You must be a member to read this story.
Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here
Otherwise, follow the link below to join.
To Our Valued Readers –
Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.
For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.
Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.
Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.
Need to set up your free e-Newspaper all-access account? click here.
Non-subscribers
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
Register to comment
Click here create a free account for posting comments.
Note that free accounts do not include access to premium content on this site.
I am anchor
Arizona Election 2024
Goldwater Institute, Gilbert and school districts battle over what is electioneering
Ross D. Franklin
A sign marks the entrance to a voting precinct on the first day of early voting in the general election in Phoenix, Wednesday, Oct. 12, 2022. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
Posted
By Tom Blodgett and Janet Perez | Independent Newsmedia
The Goldwater Institute is seeking an investigation into one local town and several school districts regarding how they are marketing their election propositions as potentially being illegal.
Those organizations are pushing back saying there is nothing wrong with providing information to the public and that everything they are doing has been legally vetted and in accordance with state law.
The conservative Scottsdale-based organization on Thursday said it sent letters to the town of Gilbert as well as the Gilbert, Queen Creek, Deer Valley and Buckeye Elementary school districts questioning their election information and has asked the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office to investigate, according to Joe Setyon, senior communications manager with Goldwater.
“Towns, school districts, and other government entities must follow state law and stop using taxpayer money to advocate for higher taxes, more spending, or any other issue on the ballot,” he said in a release. “Any information about these elections provided by the government must be neutral, unless specifically authorized by law."
Town of Gilbert officials say in a statement they fully complied with the law and that state law allows for educating the public.
“State law allows for the use of public resources to educate and inform about ballot measures provided the information does not support or oppose the measure,” the town said in a statement. “Our commitment to maintaining fair and neutral elections is unwavering, and we take great care to ensure that all communications are neutral and impartial and adhere to appropriate legal standards.”
Goldwater’s letter cites two videos posted to social media and mailers sent to residents regarding the city having a permanent base adjustment on the ballot. Such an adjustment would allow the town to reestablish its baseline spending under state law that was last set in 1998.
Another video focused on the benefits of passing Proposition 498, which would exempt a capital projects accumulation fund from the limit. Goldwater contends there were no arguments against the measure in the video.
Goldwater also accuses the Gilbert Unified School District of electioneering by promoting its budget override through signs at schools and what it calls “one-sided online messaging” after losing a similar election last year, Setyon said.
“This time, the district is aggressively promoting the budget override continuation through coordinated signage at Gilbert Public Schools locations, one-sided online messaging (including a video that portrays passage in a glowing light and defeat of the measure in a negative light), and even the appearance of ‘Yes’ campaign yard signs in front of some school buildings. Obviously, these actions are neither impartial nor neutral,” he said in the release.
In a statement from the district, officials said all correspondence is reviewed by the Maricopa County Superintendent of Public Instruction’s office as well as the district’s legal counsel.
“All educational entities, including GPS, are able to provide factual information regarding the ballot measure associated with the continuation of the budget override,” the district wrote in a statement. “The majority of information on the website comes directly from the Voter Informational Pamphlet (VIP) which is required by statute. This VIP is carefully reviewed by the County Superintendent’s Office as well as district legal counsel.”
As to the signs at schools, the district confirmed they are on public not school property, officials said.
In Queen Creek, Goldwater objected to several items on the district’s override renewal website, including language in a video titled “What is an Override,” which the institute claims are electioneering slogans and items stating what the district could lose if the override does not pass.
Like both Gilbert entities, Queen Creek district officials say all the information is factual and educational, and all has been looked at by counsel.
“QCUSD is responsible for keeping our community informed by providing factual and accurate information on the override renewal,” wrote Amanda deNight, director of marketing and public relations for the district, in an email. “All information portrayed on our website is 100% factual and has been legally vetted. We aim to inform our residents with factual information so that they can make educated decisions. QCUSD complies fully with all legal requirements, ensuring public trust about all financial matters.”