Log in

Proposed legislation

Power companies not taking stance on wind farm bill

Posted 12/31/69

The Valley’s two major utility companies aren’t yet taking a stance on proposed legislation that would bar any wind farm within a six-mile distance of anyone else’s property without …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Proposed legislation

Power companies not taking stance on wind farm bill

Posted

The Valley’s two major utility companies aren’t yet taking a stance on proposed legislation that would bar any wind farm within a six-mile distance of anyone else’s property without that person’s consent.

The legislation — House Bill 2223 — would require county supervisors to first hold a public hearing and mandate that any approved development have sufficient financial bonds to assure that any traces from the turbine are cleaned up once the turbines are no longer functional.

And if approved and signed into law, it actually would put a halt to many projects in the works. As crafted by Rep. David Marshall, restrictions would be retroactive to Jan. 1.

Both Arizona Public Service Co. and Salt River Project said in separate statements they did not have a position on the matter.

But SRP said it had “concerns” over possible new processes within the proposed bill.

“While SRP has not yet taken a position on House Bill 2223, we have concerns about new processes that could impact SRP’s ability to deliver affordable, reliable and sustainable energy to its customers,” the SRP statement read.  

SRP wind farm bill legislation

Share with others