The Valley’s two major utility companies aren’t yet taking a stance on proposed legislation that would bar any wind farm within a six-mile distance of anyone else’s property without …
Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Already have an account? Log in to continue.
Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here
Otherwise, follow the link below to join.
Please log in to continue |
The Valley’s two major utility companies aren’t yet taking a stance on proposed legislation that would bar any wind farm within a six-mile distance of anyone else’s property without that person’s consent.
The legislation — House Bill 2223 — would require county supervisors to first hold a public hearing and mandate that any approved development have sufficient financial bonds to assure that any traces from the turbine are cleaned up once the turbines are no longer functional.
And if approved and signed into law, it actually would put a halt to many projects in the works. As crafted by Rep. David Marshall, restrictions would be retroactive to Jan. 1.
Both Arizona Public Service Co. and Salt River Project said in separate statements they did not have a position on the matter.
But SRP said it had “concerns” over possible new processes within the proposed bill.
“While SRP has not yet taken a position on House Bill 2223, we have concerns about new processes that could impact SRP’s ability to deliver affordable, reliable and sustainable energy to its customers,” the SRP statement read.
Share with others