Log in

Courts

Goldwater Institute sues Phoenix over new prevailing wage for construction workers

The Goldwater Institute is suing the city of Phoenix over its new prevailing wage for construction workers contracted with the city.

The new city ordinance sets a required pay rate, often …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Courts

Goldwater Institute sues Phoenix over new prevailing wage for construction workers

Posted

The Goldwater Institute is suing the city of Phoenix over its new prevailing wage for construction workers contracted with the city.

The new city ordinance sets a required pay rate, often including benefits, for construction and trade workers based on their position and qualifications. This has been practice for federally funded projects for nearly a century, including construction projects in Phoenix that are in part federally funded, based on the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931.

READ MORE: Phoenix passes prevailing wage for construction workers

The change has evoked the lawsuit from Goldwater over a stance the move violates state law. A 1984 Arizona law restricts governments inside the state from enacting a prevailing wage. However, last year Attorney General Kris Mayes released an opinion that she believes a 2006 law allowing municipalities to enact their own minimum wages eclipses the 1984 law. Mayes opined that a prevailing wage is a type of minimum wage.

The six council members who voted to approve the prevailing wage trusted the AG’s interpretation.

In a news release Wednesday, Goldwater said it is suing on behalf of the Associated Minority Contractors of Arizona, the Arizona Builders Alliance and the Arizona Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America.

“Phoenix’s illegal ‘prevailing wage’ mandate will make life more difficult for countless small businesses that are already struggling to stay afloat,’” stated Ricardo Carlo, President of the Associated Minority Contractors of Arizona in Goldwater’s release.“‘Prevailing wage’ laws drive qualified contractors out of the market and are detrimental to businesses, employees, taxpayers, and residents—disproportionately harming minorities. It’s simple: the government should never restrict who can compete for taxpayer-funded construction projects.”

The conservative think tank also claimed the mandate violates the Arizona Constitution’s guarantee of due process of law, because it gives the city engineer virtually unlimited power to investigate and punish businesses for alleged infractions.

“When the government imposes restrictive ‘prevailing wage’ mandates—as the federal government does, and as several other cities and states across the country have tried to do—everybody loses,” stated Goldwater Institute Staff Attorney John Thorpe, lead attorney on the case. “Taxpayers have to pay more and wait longer for projects to get done; employees have a harder time finding work; and businesses, especially small businesses, suffer from higher costs and fewer opportunities.”

Goldwater did not mention AG Mayes’ opinion in its news release.

Read more about Goldwater’s announcement of its lawsuit here.

Share with others