Log in

Government

Audit rips Arizona State Land Department for low rates on leases

Saudi company, water pumping key issues that led to audit

Posted 2/23/24

PHOENIX — State Auditor General Lindsey Perry is blasting the Arizona State Land Department for leasing land to a Saudi-owned company in western Arizona for below-market rates and not requiring …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Government

Audit rips Arizona State Land Department for low rates on leases

Saudi company, water pumping key issues that led to audit

Posted

PHOENIX — State Auditor General Lindsey Perry is blasting the Arizona State Land Department for leasing land to a Saudi-owned company in western Arizona for below-market rates and not requiring it to pay for — or even report — the amount of groundwater it has been using.

In an often-scathing special report, Perry said her staff found the agency’s practices for valuing the land it leases do not fully align with what are considered “recommended practices.” And she said the policies of the Land Department set the rental rate for farmable land at just half the market retail rental rate.

That’s just the start. Perry said state law requires the department to conduct a mass appraisal of its properties at least once every 10 years to determine its agricultural rental rates. But the last one was done in 2005.

More specifically, rental rates were not adjusted over the past 17 years, resulting in incorrect charges that, for just last year, resulted in $3.4 million less in revenues going into the land trust that provides revenues for K-12 education and other beneficiaries.

And relating to Fondomonte, the Saudi company growing alfalfa for dairy cattle in the Middle East on state-leased land, Perry said not only was the company paying below-market rates for the land but the Land Department didn’t require any additional payment for the water it was pumping from the ground.

At one of the company’s farm areas, auditors said Fondomonte was paying $25 an acre this past year. Not only is that lower than the 2005 market rate of $46, but it falls far short of the $125 an acre figure, one based on 2018 market rates.

And at another, the report says the state should have been getting $175 an acre based on 2018 rates; it was paying just $30 an acre.

On top of that, Perry said there were no provisions in the lease to protect water basin levels. Instead, she said, is that the only requirement on Fondomonte was to “use water in the most efficient manner possible.”

“However, we found the department did not have a documented process to monitor or ensure its lessees are using water efficiently,” Perry reported.

In fact, she noted, some Land Department staffers recommended in 2015 and 2016 the agency actually monitor Fondomonte’s water use, seeking the company’s cooperation to install meters on its wells and report annual water usage.

“But the department did not implement recommended measures,” Perry said.

In her formal response, Robyn Sahid, tapped by Gov. Katie Hobbs to head the agency, said she found no fault with Perry’s report.

As to Fondomonte and the lack of monitoring of water use or ensuring its efficient use, Sahid acknowledged her agency has several lease requirements “that lack oversight standards and processes for monitoring and ensuring compliance.”

“Arizona State Land Department will work to secure resources to ensure that it develops clear, transparent guidelines and expectations for customers, that those guidelines can be implemented and enforced,” Sahid wrote.

Hobbs, for her part, said her administration has been “working tirelessly to fix’’ what the report found. More to the point, the governor said it’s a problem she inherited from Doug Ducey, her predecessor.

“It’s clear from this report that the previous administration failed to take action to protect the trust and the beneficiaries by allowing unchecked amounts of groundwater to be pumped on cheap leases that did not deliver market value to our state,” Hobbs said in a prepared statement.

The former governor, for his part, rejected any blame.

“We are proud of the work done by (former) Commissioner (Lisa) Atkins and her staff," said Daniel Scarpinato, Ducey’s former chief of state, in a prepared statement, though he did not address any of the specific findings in the audit.

“As for the statements from the governor’s office, this seems like little more than eyewash to cover up for being outsmarted by the attorney general on yet another issue," he said. That is a reference to the fact that it was Attorney General Kris Mayes who led the charge last year to quash the Fondomonte leases even as Hobbs said she was still exploring options.

Mayes praised the new report.

“She believes it is a travesty that Arizona public school students have been short-changed for the benefit of a foreign corporation,” said press aide Richie Taylor.

At the heart of the issue are five separate leases of state land in western Arizona to Fondomonte totaling more than 6,608 acres. The company had come under public scrutiny amid reports it was taking advantage of no regulation of groundwater pumping in most rural areas of the state, allowing Fondomonte to pump as much as it wanted, without regard to how it affected other landowners in the same basin.

What also raised the ire of some lawmakers is Fondomonte was growing alfalfa here to feed to cattle in Saudi Arabia because that water-starved county does not permit such farming.

Aside from groundwater depletion was the issue of what the company was paying. That is a crucial issue because the Land Department is charged with obtaining the maximum revenue from the more than 9 million acres of state land it manages. The revenues are allocated to the beneficiaries of the land trust which include not only K-12 education but also the universities, the School for the Deaf and the Blind and the Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry.

A 640-acre lease was canceled in October after the Land Department said the company was in violation of the agreement’s terms because of how it was storing fuel on the site.

Hobbs announced at the same time she would not renew three other leases totaling 2,880 acres when they were set to expire this month. She said the Land Department determined the leases in the Butler Valley are “not in the best interest of the (land) trust’s beneficiaries due to excessive amounts of water being pumped from the land — free of charge.”

Those leases, according to the Land Department, were terminated on Feb. 14. The company has until May 14 to remove any improvements and personal property from the parcels.

A fifth lease of 3,088 acres in the Ranegras Plain Basin where Fondomonte grows alfalfa, corn and Bermuda grass is unaffected, with the lease running to 2031.

None of this affects any land the company owns itself or leases from other private landowners.

This report was generated following a request in November from the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, made up of lawmakers from both parties. Legislators asked Perry’s office in November to take a closer look at not just the Fondomonte leases but the way the Land Department has been run.

In the detailed report, the auditors found the practices for determining the rental rates differs from other states and “does not fully align with all recommended practices we reviewed.”

For example, the report states, the Land Department uses what it calls a “mass appraisal” to determine what is the value of the land that someone seeks to lease. Auditors said that is flawed, saying the actual value should be based on looking at each specific property involved.

Of greater concern is that, even with the mass appraisal method, auditors found the Land Department had failed to conduct these over a 17-year period despite that legal requirement for reevaluation even 10 years, something that should have occurred in 2015.

“Department staff could not identify a reason why the department did not reappraise its mass appraisals in 2015,” the report states.

Auditors said the department did obtained a 2018 study of agricultural market rental rates, one which they said showed increases of more than 200% in five farm areas.

“However, as of November 2023, the department had not adjusted its agricultural rental rates since 2006,” the report says, with the agency having no explanation why there was no update.

All that, according to auditors, comes at a cost.

They said the state charged about $4.4 million in rent to its 337 active agricultural leases last year.

“However, if the department had updated its agricultural rental rates based on the 2018 market study, which would have increased rates in most of the department’s farm areas, it would have potentially collected approximately $7.8 million during this year,’’ the report states.

All of that, the auditors said, relates directly to the question lawmakers asked about the Fondomonte leases. Their conclusion is the company has been getting land and water at below market rates.

Here, too, much of the issue relates to the failure of the Land Department to update its appraisals.

Then there’s that water question.

Perry said the Land Department does not charge agricultural users for water use based on the premise that water availability is a factor considered in its mass appraisal process. But she said that even the agency concluded that the value of the water uses on its Butler Valley properties was between $1.2 million and $2.5 million.