Log in

Election 2026

Arizona secretary of state wins fight over ballot language on election proposition

PHOENIX — The Arizona Supreme Court won’t order Secretary of State Adrian Fontes to recraft his description of a ballot measure that, if approved, would make some major changes in state election practices.

In a divided opinion Wednesday, Chief Justice Ann Scott Timmer said the language prepared by Fontes, which will go on every ballot, “is not false or clearly misleading.” Timmer said that the Arizona law that requires such explanations gives the secretary of state, along with the attorney general, broad discretion in determining what to put in the description and what to leave out.

But even if it did not, Timmer, joined by three other justices, said it doesn’t matter. She said supporters of Proposition 144 who filed suit are not personally and immediately harmed by the secretary’s decision. And that, she said, means they lack standing in the first place to seek an order of mandamus — essentially a court directive order to compel Fontes to change the wording.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in