Opinion

Simonson: Scottsdale’s election status quo needs to go

Posted 5/4/22

Scottsdale is a world-class metropolitan city, yet it runs its City Council races like a small desert outpost.

Citizen commissions have recommended changing Scottsdale’s elections from …

This story requires a subscription for $5.99/month.
Already a subscriber? Log in to continue. Otherwise, click here to subscribe.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in

Subscribe to our e-newsletter for continued access

Free newsletter subscribers to the Daily Independent can enjoy free access to our AP stories, Capital Media Services, earned media and special contributors on our Opinions with Civility pages. If you aren’t a free newsletter subscriber yet, join now and continue accessing more content. This does not include our exclusive content written by the newsroom. We hope you’ll consider supporting our journalism.

I am anchor
Opinion

Simonson: Scottsdale’s election status quo needs to go

Posted

Scottsdale is a world-class metropolitan city, yet it runs its City Council races like a small desert outpost.

Citizen commissions have recommended changing Scottsdale’s elections from at-large to districts for two decades. We have waited long enough for those elected by the status quo to implement this necessary change. It is time for Scottsdale residents to take matters into their own hands and bring the question to a vote in the November election.

Benefits of districts include:

Districts will ensure all of Scottsdale is represented on the council, not just one part of town. Currently, all City Councilmembers live north of the Shea Corridor, while most Scottsdale residents live south of the corridor. Different parts of the city have different issues and needs and should be represented on council.

Districts will make it easier for residents to have their issues heard by the council. By decreasing the number of constituents each City Council member represents, it will be easier for residents to have their voices heard, and it will ensure their representatives are familiar with residents’ local concerns.

Districts will make elections more straightforward. Currently, voters are asked to choose “up to three” council members each election. Most only vote for one person, with only about 2% of Scottsdale voters finishing this portion of the ballot. Clearly, the at-large elections are not fully engaging voters. Candidates also regularly ask their supporters to only vote for them — encouraging undervote.

Districts can reduce outside spending in elections. Scottsdale elections are getting expensive. In 2020, some candidates spent more than a quarter-million dollars to reach voters. With high price tags like this, candidates can be attracted to big donations from special interest groups such as developers and unions.

Reducing the size of elections will help reign in outside spending while also making running for City Council easier for more Scottsdale residents.

The 3-2-ONE Scottsdale group is circulating a petition that will bring more direct representation to Scottsdale. Three districts: central, north, and south, will be drawn based on geography and have about 80,000 residents each.

Each district will have two City Councilmembers, elected in staggered terms. This means you will vote for one candidate for City Council every election, just like you most likely already do.

Three districts with two representatives each were recommended back in 2003. The system made sense then, and it makes sense now. First, the question must qualify for the ballot. We need your help to gather the necessary signatures for that to happen. Visit 32ONEScottsdale.com to sign up as a volunteer. Together, we can bring equal representation to Scottsdale.

Editor’s Note: Paul Simonson is a Scottsdale resident and the chairman of 3-2-ONE political action committee.

Comments

2 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • xway.mike.norton

    Tell the truth - if you want voters to support this proposition start by . . Telling . . the . . Truth.

    So why do the 3-2-One PAC leaders consistently hide the truth in every ad and every column?

    The single most important member of the Scottsdale City Council is long time South Scottsdale Resident Mayor Ortega. The other 2020 candidate for Mayor, Lisa Borowsky, also lives in South Scottsdale. No other candidate North of the Downtown area survived the Primary.

    Enabling the 3-2-ONE PAC donors to throw lots of money at a single District election is not designed to protect South Scottsdale residents. It is designed solely for the purpose of protecting the Simonson property holdings and those of the other major donors.

    If Simonson wants to buy a few City Council seats, run for City Council. This plan makes no sense to anyone other than the rental property owners who control the PAC.

    Wednesday, May 4 Report this

  • jason.alexander

    Paul Simonson, son of Mike and Cindy - the largest single donors to Solange Whitehead, Kathy Littlefield, Barry Graham. And the largest donors in 2020 to Janik, Durham, Littlefield, Guy Phillips and Ortega. These candidates are in the pocket of the anti-competitive special interest, the Simonsons want their Old Town properties to not face competition and thus be more valuable.

    Wednesday, May 4 Report this