Log in

Letters

Duell: Proposition 140 is confusing, complicated and could disenfranchise voters

The last thing Arizona needs is a confusing, complicated, California-style election scheme that could disenfranchise voters. Proposition 140 would import to Arizona some of the worst components of California’s election system like jungle primaries and Ranked-Choice Voting.

Jungle primaries and ranked-choice voting create an incredibly confusing and opaque process that is prone to errors. Two months after a 2022 California school board election using ranked-choice voting, it was finally discovered that votes had been incorrectly tabulated and the wrong candidate had been certified as the winner.

Ranked-choice voting also disenfranchises voters. It forces voters to rank and cast a ballot for candidates they don’t support in order to ensure that their ballot is not discarded in the numerous rounds of vote tabulation.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Letters

Duell: Proposition 140 is confusing, complicated and could disenfranchise voters

Posted

The last thing Arizona needs is a confusing, complicated, California-style election scheme that could disenfranchise voters. Proposition 140 would import to Arizona some of the worst components of California’s election system like jungle primaries and Ranked-Choice Voting.

Jungle primaries and ranked-choice voting create an incredibly confusing and opaque process that is prone to errors. Two months after a 2022 California school board election using ranked-choice voting, it was finally discovered that votes had been incorrectly tabulated and the wrong candidate had been certified as the winner.

Ranked-choice voting also disenfranchises voters. It forces voters to rank and cast a ballot for candidates they don’t support in order to ensure that their ballot is not discarded in the numerous rounds of vote tabulation.

New York City used ranked-choice voting for their 2021 mayor’s race, and it took eight rounds of tabulation to declare a winner. More than 140,000 voters were effectively disenfranchised due to “ballot exhaustion,” since they didn’t rank all the candidates. It’s as if those voters didn’t even cast a ballot, since their votes were not counted in the final vote total.

Arizonans want an election system where it is easy to vote and hard to cheat. California-style jungle primaries and ranked-choice voting only increase distrust, confusion and chaos in our election system. Heritage Action urges voters to vote NO on Prop 140.

Editor’s note: Nathan Duell is Arizona state director of Heritage Action for America, Glendale. Reader reactions, pro or con, are welcomed at AzOpinions@iniusa.org.

Proposition 140, Prop 140, jungle primaries, ranked-choice voting, 2024 election

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here