Cravens: Letter writer once again makes ridiculous claims

By Gregory Cravens
Posted 10/14/20

I would like to respond to the letter from Jean Goncalves, regarding the vice presidential debate.

The letter writer makes a ridiculous claim regarding the “speaking” time that …

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, subscribers will receive unlimited access to the website, including access to our Daily Independent e-edition, which features Arizona-specific journalism and items you can’t find in our community print products, such as weather reports, comics, crossword puzzles, advice columns and so much more six days a week.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Cravens: Letter writer once again makes ridiculous claims

Posted

I would like to respond to the letter from Jean Goncalves, regarding the vice presidential debate.

The letter writer makes a ridiculous claim regarding the “speaking” time that “way more time was given to Kamala Harris” versus the time given to Mike Pence. In fact, a CBS News tally of each candidate’s speaking time shows that Mike Pence was given 38 minutes versus Kamala Harris’s 35 minutes (https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54467093).

Once again, this letter writer shows a complete disregard for facts and reality, similar to her party’s approach when it comes to science and medicine.

The most telling example of this syndrome was when Mr. Pence stated “From the very first day, President Donald Trump has put the health of America first.”

I would suspect there are about 212,000 or more American families who would dispute that assertion. As far as the opinion that Kamal Harris came across as “arrogant, snarky, and very rude” - that is the “go-to” Republican classification for any strong, intelligent female these days. Those very same attributes would be heralded in a male candidate as strength, intelligence, and assertiveness.

And by the way, has Ms. Goncalves ever actually listened to the President of the United States speak (or Tweet, as is his custom)? He is a rude, demeaning, classless, loudmouth bully.

But I guess since he antagonizes those people who have traditionally been “second-class citizens” in this country, that is just a-okay with her!

She supports a man who has no platform, no plan, and no vision other than taking this country back to a time when only straight, white male Christians had any say in how this country is run.

Wake up and smell the 21st Century, it’s here whether you want it to be or not.

Editor's note: Gregory Cravens is a Peoria resident.

Comments