Log in

Crossing the Is and dotting the Ts: Peoria general plan sees last minute amendments

Posted 5/10/20

The Peoria Planning and Zoning Commission as well as the City Council considered a number of minor general plan amendments recently.

But that doesn’t mean the city is seeing a rapid influx of new development.

If anything ...

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Crossing the Is and dotting the Ts: Peoria general plan sees last minute amendments

Posted

The Peoria Planning and Zoning Commission as well as the City Council considered a number of minor general plan amendments recently.

But that doesn’t necessarily mean the city is seeing a rapid influx of new development.

If anything, blame the fact that the final version of the general plan is about to be put on the ballot.

The general plan is a municipality’s road map to how the city will look in the years to come and establishes the vision and guidance for current and future development. The plan must be updated every 10 years and be voter-approved, according to Arizona state law.

The process is nearly complete.

As such, the city recently considered any and all last proposed refinements to the general plan.

Planning and Community Development Director Chris Jacques said due to ballot and pamphlet lead times needed to place it on the ballot, a number of amendments had to move to council by April in order to ready the general plan for the ballot, thus the influx of minor general plan amendments.

Mr. Jacques said in May staff will be asking city council to place a final version of the general plan on the Nov. 3 ballot. Additionally, between May 19 and Nov. 3, the city is instituting a general plan blackout, meaning Peoria will not take any action on general plan amendments during that time.

“The purpose of this blackout is to minimize voter confusion.  Hence, the timing issue of hearing minor general plan amendments in April,” he said.

Typically, a general plan amendment moves forward with an associated rezone, but that is not happening right now due to the timing of the general plan’s move to the ballot.

The associated rezones – when they are ready to move forward – will be heard at a future planning and zoning commission and city council public hearing, Mr. Jacques said.

“There are no projected hearing dates for those rezones right now. When they do move forward, the city will provide full notification as required under the zoning ordinance, which includes direct notification to property owners of record within the radius,” he said.

Among others, the city has considered cases regarding Arrowhead RV & Boat Storage at 112th Avenue and Beardsley Road, the Cowley property near Ridgeline Road and 135th Avenue and Peoria Commons at 91st and Olive avenues. Some of these have generated public interest, which can be addressed during their companion rezoning cases.

Mr. Jacques said people often confuse the general plan with zoning, but they are very different.

“At the general plan level, we are just looking at the land-use appropriateness of the request. At the rezone level, we are considering specific attributes of the development proposal and standards such as traffic, building height, density, product type, open space, connectivity and so forth,” Mr. Jacques said. “There has been some public interest on the Arrowhead RV and Cowley cases. It’s important to note that those concerns will be addressed and conditioned, if appropriate, during the rezone. That is the appropriate place to address detailed, development plan concerns.”

Philip Haldiman can be reached at 623-876-3697, phaldiman@newszap.com, or on Twitter @philiphaldiman.