Log in

Opinion

Waldron: Don’t call annexed area ‘south Apache Junction’

The Apache Junction/Gold Canyon Independent has referred to the recently annexed land south of U.S. Highway 60 as “South Apache Junction” in several articles over the past few months.

By using that reference then, the area north of US60 becomes “North Apache Junction.” So why is the Independent trying to split AJ as north and south? Is it some attempt to create division in AJ for some future advertising revenue?

We are all Apache Junction whether the land lies north or south of US60, we will always be AJ and we need to embrace the newly annexed land and further expansion in the future.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Opinion

Waldron: Don’t call annexed area ‘south Apache Junction’

Posted

The Apache Junction/Gold Canyon Independent has referred to the recently annexed land south of U.S. Highway 60 as “South Apache Junction” in several articles over the past few months.

By using that reference then, the area north of US60 becomes “North Apache Junction.” So why is the Independent trying to split AJ as north and south? Is it some attempt to create division in AJ for some future advertising revenue?

We are all Apache Junction whether the land lies north or south of US60, we will always be AJ and we need to embrace the newly annexed land and further expansion in the future.

Please stop referring to the newly annexed area as “South Apache Junction” and call it what it is, Apache Junction.

Editor’s note: Dave Waldron is a resident of Apache Junction.

letters, opinion

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here