Valley cities rank good to below average on best cities for women, report says
Health care has a major impact on women's lives, and it is part of the reason why Valley cities rank where they do on the Wallethub list of best places for women to live.
Metro Creative
Eight Valley cities ranked among the list of those that are best for women, with a wide spread on those that were above average and those that were below.
Financial website Wallethub ranked 182 U.S. cities, including the 150 most populous, on 15 metrics of living standards for women to determine which are the best. Those indicators range from median earnings to quality of hospitals and suicide rates for women.
Four Valley cities — Scottsdale, Gilbert, Peoria and Chandler — ranked higher than average, largely on the upside of being well regarded for economic and social well-being, according to the report.
You must be a member to read this story.
Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
Register to comment
Click here create a free account for posting comments.
Note that free accounts do not include access to premium content on this site.
I am anchor
Community
Valley cities rank good to below average on best cities for women, report says
Metro Creative
Health care has a major impact on women's lives, and it is part of the reason why Valley cities rank where they do on the Wallethub list of best places for women to live.
Posted
Independent Newsmedia
Eight Valley cities ranked among the list of those that are best for women, with a wide spread on those that were above average and those that were below.
Financial website Wallethub ranked 182 U.S. cities, including the 150 most populous, on 15 metrics of living standards for women to determine which are the best. Those indicators range from median earnings to quality of hospitals and suicide rates for women.
Four Valley cities — Scottsdale, Gilbert, Peoria and Chandler — ranked higher than average, largely on the upside of being well regarded for economic and social well-being, according to the report.
The remaining four — Mesa, Tempe, Phoenix and Glendale — had lower scores for economic factors as well as women's health care and safety, according to the report.
For women's economic and social well-being, which comprised 60% of the scoring, the report looked at median earnings, unemployment rate, job security, share of women living in poverty, share of women-owned businesses and "economic clout" of women-owned firms.
For women's health care and safety, which comprised 40% of the scoring, it looked at abortion policies and access, quality of women's hospitals, women's uninsured rate, women's preventative health care, share of physically active women, share of women who are obese, suicide rate for women, life expectancy and prevalence of rape victimization.
Below is the overall rank of the Valley cities. To see where they fit into the list, click here.
Scottsdale: No. 34 overall, No. 17 on economic and social well-being, No. 88 on health care and safety.
Glibert: No. 39 overall, No. 39 for economic and social well-being, No. 79 for health care and safety.
Peoria: No. 50 overall, No. 54 for economic and social well-being, No. 86 for health care and safety.
Chandler: No. 57 overall, No. 47 for economic and social well-being, No. 99 for health care and safety.
Mesa: No. 100 overall, No. 91 for economic and social well-being, No. 95 for health care and safety.
Tempe: No. 113 overall, No. 92 for econoimc and social well-being, No. 106 for health care and safety.
Phoenix: No. 109 overall, No. 109 for economic and social well-being, No. 117 for health care and safety.
Glendale: No. 137 overall, No. 129 for economic and social well-being, No. 116 for health care and safety.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here