Log in

Scottsdale looks to settle accident case with $55K payment

Posted 10/26/16

A settlement is in play for the city of Scottsdale as the local governing board will decide whether to dish out $55,000 to avoid any further litigation in the case Privette v. City of …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Scottsdale looks to settle accident case with $55K payment

Posted
A settlement is in play for the city of Scottsdale as the local governing board will decide whether to dish out $55,000 to avoid any further litigation in the case Privette v. City of Scottsdale.

This case stems from Nilsene A. Privette taking legal action against the city for a trip-and-fall accident at the intersection of Indian School Road and Marshall Way on Aug. 31, 2013, according to a city staff proposal.

Ms. Nilsene brought a negligence lawsuit against the city with an original Notice of Claim totaling $225,000 from the city, the proposal states.

According to the proposal, paying the settlement would result in the dismissal of the case and termination of the litigation. This would mean, the city would remove any additional costs of proceeding with the litigation, the proposal states.

If the city council approves the settlement at its Tuesday, Oct. 25 city council meeting, payment of the settlement will proceed after the execution of the necessary paperwork, according to the proposal.