Government

Maricopa County Supervisors lambaste Arizona Senate election request

Officials say audit has made ‘mockery’ of process

Posted 5/17/21

PHOENIX — Maricopa County supervisors on Monday blasted Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, accusing her of allowing a “mockery” to be made of the election process with her …

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, subscribers will receive unlimited access to the website, including access to our Daily Independent e-edition, which features Arizona-specific journalism and items you can’t find in our community print products, such as weather reports, comics, crossword puzzles, advice columns and so much more six days a week.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Government

Maricopa County Supervisors lambaste Arizona Senate election request

Officials say audit has made ‘mockery’ of process

Posted

PHOENIX — Maricopa County supervisors on Monday blasted Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, accusing her of allowing a “mockery” to be made of the election process with her audit.

On one hand, the board and County Recorder Stephen Richer prepared a 14-page letter responding to specific questions — they called them accusations — about everything from handling of the ballots to whether a database had been deleted after the election but before files were delivered to Senate-hired auditors. In each case, they said either the information is false or that they cannot or will not provide what she wants.

But, one by one, each official lashed out at Sen. Fann and the Senate for perpetuating what several said amounts to a hoax on the public. And they said she has effectively given over the Senate’s powers to Cyber Ninjas, an outside group that not only has no election audit experience but is now using it to raise money.

If the message of Monday’s meeting is lost on Sen. Fann and other senators, board Chairman Jack Sellers put it succinctly.

“As chairman of this board, I want to make it clear: I will not be responding to any more requests from this sham process,” he said.
“Finish what you’re calling an ‘audit,’” Mr. Sellers continued. “Be ready to defend your report in a court of law.”

In doing so, Mr. Sellers and the Republican-dominated board confirmed what had pretty much been clear since last week; Board members will not show up at the Senate Tuesday, as requested by Sen. Fann, for a televised question-and-answer session with her, Sen. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Ken Bennett, a former secretary of state who Sen. Fann tapped to be her liaison with the outside contractors.

In fact, Supervisor Bill Gates said there’s good reason to stay away.

“This board was going to be part of a political theater broadcast on livestream on OAN,” he said, a reference to One America News Network, a pro-Trump cable news outlet that not only has fueled the theories that somehow the former president did not lose the election but also is helping to raise money to fund what is supposed to be an official, government-conducted audit.

Monday’s response now leaves it up to Sen. Fann on how to respond.

The Senate has gone to court before to force the supervisors to surrender the 2.1 million ballots and the election equipment. But a maneuver to actually hold the supervisors in contempt — a move that could have allowed the Senate sergeant-at-arms to take supervisors into custody — failed when Sen. Paul Boyer, R-Glendale, refused to go along with his other 15 GOP colleagues.

Sen. Boyer in recent days has indicated even more hesitancy about pursuing the issue. And Mr. Richer, a Republican like Sen. Fann and the majority of the Senate, said he thinks the tide is turning.

“I guarantee you, there are Republicans in the state Senate ... that do not believe a word of it,” he said.

With Democrats firmly against the whole process, that could leave Sen. Fann with few options to force further compliance.
There was no immediate response from the Senate president as to what, if anything, she intends to do now.

Political charges aside, there was a response to what Sen. Fann asked.

For example, Sen. Fann — working with questions provided to her by Cyber Ninjas -- said there are “a significant number of instances in which there is a disparity between the actual number of ballots contained in a batch and the total denoted on the pink report slip accompanying the batch.”

“They don’t know how to read transmission slips,” Mr. Richer said of the auditors.

For example, he said some ballots out of any batch of 200 might be pulled out because they can’t be read by the tabulators. And that, said Mr. Richer, creates a duplicate ballot.

As to claims of deleted databases, he said “that’s just fundamentally not true.”

“If they were professional, certified auditors they wouldn’t be asking those questions,” Mr. Sellers said.

Ditto, Mr. Richer said, about the demand for the county’s routers, the computer equipment that acts like traffic directors for data between computers.

“We do not know why Cyber Ninjas would need the routers, as they have no election information,” Mr. Richer said. Aside from the $6 million cost of pulling them out and putting in temporary replacements, he said Sheriff Paul Penzone is concerned what is on them could provide a “blueprint” of computers used by law enforcement that could allow someone to compromise the system.

Mr. Richer also said Cyber Ninjas has no need for internal passwords to get at the source code for the tallying machines. Anyway, he said, that information belongs to Dominion Voting Systems. And he said Dominion gave them directly to the two certified auditors the county hired — again, Cyber Ninjas is not — and does not share them with election officials.

Mr. Sellers said he sees a pattern in the requests.

“It’s become clear that some of these people are only going to be happy when they get the results they want,” he said — meaning a finding that somehow Trump won the election, regardless of whether there is actual evidence to back that up.

Mr. Gates said it is possible the Senate at one time had a legitimate reason to review the ballots and equipment. He noted that Sen. Fann said the whole purpose was to review the process and determine whether changes are needed in state laws on how elections are run.

But Mr. Gates said that stopped being the driving force long ago now that “outside forces” have taken control. That, he said, has become obvious because everyone admits the audit can’t be completed for the $150,000 the Senate allocated.

“Tell us where the money is coming from,” Mr. Gates said. So far, though, neither Cyber Ninjas nor Mr. Bennett has provided details. And Sen. Fann, who is supposed to be in charge, said she doesn’t know.

Mr. Gates acknowledged he and his GOP colleagues are in some ways bucking the partisan tide.

“We recognize ... that a large percentage of Republicans believe that the election was stolen in 2020 and that Donald Trump actually won,” he said. But Mr. Gates said he does not share that belief.

“And the reason that I feel confident in saying that, particularly in Maricopa County, is that we overturned every stone,” he said. “We asked the difficult questions.”

Now, said Mr. Gates, is the time to say that enough is enough.
“It is time to push back on the Big Lie,” he said. “Orherwise we are not going to be able to move forward and have an election in 2022 that we can all believe the results, whatever they may be.”

Mr. Richer said there’s another reason people should believe his assurances that the 2020 results are accurate.
He pointed out he wasn’t even running the office at that time. Mr. Richer took over in January after defeating Democrat Adrian Fontes who did run the election.

“Why would I stand here beside these gentlemen to say, ‘It was a good election’ if it wasn’t?” he asked.

“Why wouldn’t I just throw the guy that I spent the past 12 months criticizing, Adrian Fontes, under the bus and say, ‘Don’t worry, there’s a new sheriff in town’”? Mr. Richer continued. “So it’s just facially asinine.”

Comments