Log in

Opinion

Constitution doesn’t specify who administers oath to lawmakers

In regard to Professor Jennifer L. Selin’s opinion, House speaker’s refusal to seat Adelita Grijalva supported by history, law:

If administration is at the discretion of the speaker, at what point does his refusal to administer it run afoul of Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486 (1969)?

By what authority may Congress effectively prohibit a duly elected and qualified person from taking her seat?

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Opinion

Constitution doesn’t specify who administers oath to lawmakers

Posted

In regard to Professor Jennifer L. Selin’s opinion, House speaker’s refusal to seat Adelita Grijalva supported by history, law:

If administration is at the discretion of the speaker, at what point does his refusal to administer it run afoul of Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486 (1969)?

By what authority may Congress effectively prohibit a duly elected and qualified person from taking her seat?

The Constitution requires an oath. It does not specify who must administer it or give Congress authority to limit the persons who may do so.

Calvin Coolidge was sworn in by his father, a notary public and justice of the peace. Why couldn’t Rep. Grijalva have been sworn in by a notary and taken her seat?

Editor’s note: John Paul Parks is a Scottsdale attorney. Please submit comments at yourvalley.net/letters or email them to AzOpinions@iniusa.org. We are committed to publishing a wide variety of reader opinions, as long as they meet our Civility Guidelines.

Adelita Grijalva, House speaker, Constitution, Powell v. McCormack

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here