Log in

Opinion

Arizona must confront its own choices on water

OPINION – At a Western Governors’ meeting, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs accused the Upper Basin states of running out the clock and refusing real Colorado River cuts, while Arizona has already worn the austerity belt. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox sympathized, then quietly made clear Utah isn’t surrendering water anytime soon. Predictable theater.

Meanwhile, the river’s operating rules expire at the end of 2026, and the federal deadline for a new plan has already passed. Washington is preparing to intervene because the states haven’t delivered one themselves.

Yet Arizona’s messaging remains soothing: “We’re leading on conservation. We won’t accept a deal that dumps all cuts on us.” It’s the state’s greatest-hits playlist — winter lettuce, semiconductor plants, tribal claims — politically powerful, but irrelevant to hydrology. The river doesn’t respond to speeches. It delivers what nature allows, and nature is delivering less every year.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Opinion

Arizona must confront its own choices on water

Posted

OPINION – At a Western Governors’ meeting, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs accused the Upper Basin states of running out the clock and refusing real Colorado River cuts, while Arizona has already worn the austerity belt. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox sympathized, then quietly made clear Utah isn’t surrendering water anytime soon. Predictable theater.

Meanwhile, the river’s operating rules expire at the end of 2026, and the federal deadline for a new plan has already passed. Washington is preparing to intervene because the states haven’t delivered one themselves.

Yet Arizona’s messaging remains soothing: “We’re leading on conservation. We won’t accept a deal that dumps all cuts on us.” It’s the state’s greatest-hits playlist — winter lettuce, semiconductor plants, tribal claims — politically powerful, but irrelevant to hydrology. The river doesn’t respond to speeches. It delivers what nature allows, and nature is delivering less every year.

Arizona is already in Tier 1 shortages, losing about 18% of its Colorado River allocation. Next year brings more cuts. After 2026, the conversation shifts to millions of acre-feet. No number of press conferences can refill that deficit.

What’s missing is meaningful action. Arizona keeps approving subdivisions based on speculative water. “Assured supply” has morphed into marketing while reservoirs drop. That’s not water management — it’s donor-friendly theater.

Meanwhile, the true crisis sprawls: endless growth, developer pressure and infrastructure expansion built on the fantasy of infinite water. Yet the river is shrinking, reservoirs are falling and the legal scaffolding holding the system together expires in 14 months.

So yes, blame the Upper Basin. But Arizona must confront its own choices.

City councils must stop approving growth on imaginary water. Developers must drop fantasies of future augmentation. Voters must demand leaders willing to limit growth when supply shrinks.

Because in the end, physics—not politics—determines who gets water.

Please submit comments at yourvalley.net/letters or email them to AzOpinions@iniusa.org. We are committed to publishing a wide variety of reader opinions, as long as they meet our Civility Guidelines.

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here