Arizona GOP panel votes to cut state taxes

Posted 2/12/20

PHOENIX — Saying the state has more money than it needs, Republicans on a House panel voted Wednesday to cut state taxes to the tune of by nearly $162 million this coming budget year — …

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, subscribers will receive unlimited access to the website, including access to our Daily Independent e-edition, which features Arizona-specific journalism and items you can’t find in our community print products, such as weather reports, comics, crossword puzzles, advice columns and so much more six days a week.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Arizona GOP panel votes to cut state taxes

Posted

PHOENIX — Saying the state has more money than it needs, Republicans on a House panel voted Wednesday to cut state taxes to the tune of by nearly $162 million this coming budget year — and an undetermined amount years down the road.

The biggest part of HB 2778 as approved by the Ways and Means Committee on a party-line vote is an across-the-board cut in individual income tax rates. That move alone would reduce state revenues by $100 million a year, though the benefit to individual taxpayers varies.

Another provision would give businesses the ability to write off more rapidly the deprecation of equipment they buy, giving them an additional income tax deduction.

The one that could have the biggest impact over the long term, however, is to increase the amount that individuals who do not file itemized tax returns can still deduct in charitable contributions from the amount of income that is subject to state income taxes.

For the coming fiscal year that loss would be $2.1 million.

But Rep. Mitzi Epstein, D-Tempe, said the legislation would increase that allowance annually according to inflation. So the reduction in state revenues would be $4.2 million the year after next, $6.3 million the year after that — and who knows how much beyond that, as the legislative fiscal analysis does not go beyond that.

Ms. Epstein worried that this change alone eventually could balloon to $100 million a year, money she argued is needed for Arizona to meet its needs for everything from education to the problems of the homeless.

That argument, however, did not convince Rep. Joanne Osborne, R-Goodyear.

“There are always needs,” she said. “We certainly could spend every dollars that is here.”

But Ms. Osborne said it is the job of lawmakers to achieve “balance.”

“And that balance also goes towards the taxpayers,” he said.

And Rep. Ben Toma, R-Peoria, who crafted the legislation, brushed aside concerns that cutting tax rates will eat into needed state revenues.

“Broad-based tax cuts and just cutting red tape in general will lead to more revenue for everyone,” he said. “We’ve seen that happen in spite of the fact that some strongly wish that was not true.”

The legislative staff analysis of the measure does not spell out how much individuals will actually see in tax relief.

Current law has four income tax brackets, ranging from 2.59 percent for taxable income up to $26,500 a year for individuals — double that for married couples filing jointly — to 4.50 percent on income exceeding $159,000.

The legislation would drop all the rates slightly, with a new minimum of 2.53 percent and a new maximum of 4.45 percent.

Figuring out what that means is a bit more difficult.

A single person with a $25,000 taxable income now owes $648 in state income taxes using the current table. Everything else being equal, the legislation would shrink that to $633.

Someone at the $50,000 level would see the tax bill decline by about $30 to $1,441.

And individuals with $200,000 in taxable income would find they owe $6,710, down from $7,836.

What the committee approved is only part of what some Republicans are proposing to cut taxes.

Gov. Doug Ducey wants to eliminate all state income taxes for retired military. That has a $43 million price tag.

And Sen. J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler, has a package which also includes reducing business property taxes.

Part of the reason the state has money that some want to translate into tax cuts is a pair of actions last year that effectively raised taxes.

One was “conforming” Arizona’s income tax structure to changes in the 2017 federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

It eliminated many available deductions, replacing that with a higher standard deduction. But even with Arizona increasing its own standard deduction at least some people still ended up paying more because of those lost deductions.

The other was the decision by lawmakers to begin taxing online sales following a U.S. Supreme Court decision that said states are free to levy their taxes on all sales made into the state, regardless of the source. Prior to that, anything ordered from out-of-state retailers who had no physical presence in Arizona, like a retail store or distribution center, was exempt.

That tax took effect in October on retailers making at least $200,000 in direct sales in Arizona.

Lawmakers built about $85 million into the budget for the current fiscal year that runs through June 30. But legislative staffers say that the actual impact will be $70 million more. And that doesn’t count another $150 million that will go to local governments for their own sales taxes.

Ms. Epstein, however, said it’s wrong to see the additional revenues as excess revenues.

“It is not a surplus when we look at the needs of the state,” she said. “The needs of the state far outweigh any revenue that we have.”

At least part of that, Ms. Epstein said, is education.

“Our classes are so overcrowded,” she said. “And our teachers, we have a shortage of them everywhere.”

Comments