Log in

Voters reject Higley USD bond ask

Posted 11/2/21

Voters have rebuked Higley USD’s $95 million capital bond ask.

The final count Nov. 5 from the Maricopa County Elections Department showed the bond losing 6,614-5,490 (54.64-45.36%). The …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Voters reject Higley USD bond ask

Posted
Voters have rebuked Higley USD’s $95 million capital bond ask.

The final count Nov. 5 from the Maricopa County Elections Department showed the bond losing 6,614-5,490 (54.64-45.36%). The Maricopa County Elections Department listed 13,025 votes cast with 920 undervotes (no selection made) and one overvote (both yes and no selected).

In an email sent to district families Nov. 3, Superintendent Dawn Foley thanked the community for making its voice heard, though it was not the result for which the district had hoped.

"We want families to know that we remain focused on supporting our schools and students," she wrote. "As discussed in our bond presentations and at school board meetings, we are a growing school district with many capital needs. We will continue to have meetings to discuss issues and develop solutions to find the best possible way to support our students and facility needs."

Foley pledged to continue to communicate with the community while finding solutions to benefit Higley students.

HUSD Board President Kristina Reese said she was disappointed in the results and the voter turnout, which was 23.32%.

"E
ver since last election, there's been a lot of discussion about election concerns, so I don't know if that had something to do with the lower turnout," she said. "This was an all mail-in ballot, which was very different, so I don't know if that has something to do with it. I do think in our district, there was a lot of opposition with the town of Gilbert's [streets, transportation and infrastructure] bond that was displayed within our district that I felt could be confusing for our voters within the Higley district. So I'm not sure [what it was]. There's only been one other time that we've not passed an educational measure, and that was the bond to build the middle schools didn't pass [in 2012]."

The biggest item on the bond was $32 million to pay off one of the two leases on the district’s two middle schools, Cooley and Sossaman. Reese pointed out that HUSD is the only district in the state that has such a payment.

"It takes away from what we can do for our students and our staff to stay competitive and to give them what we feel that they deserve," she said.

The proposed bond measure would have funded transportation ($3.5 million) and major facility maintenance ($11 million). It also included $15.5 million to keep up the district’s commitment for a 1:1 student to technological device ratio plus fund additional safety and security measures.

It addressed future growth with $2.5 million to buy land for a future school and $27 million for major projects, such as building more classrooms at existing schools. The remainder of the money was for contingencies.

Foley said the district will have to look at its options for funding needs.


"A lot of intentional thinking and planning went into how do we do the very best for Higley with given the unique circumstances we have with our growth, with our leases, with what we've identified as our needs," she said. "We're going to have to come back and figure out how are we going to address that with the resources we have. How are we going to prioritize it? Now we just start working on that Plan B and C and D and come back with options and recommendations for the board on other next steps so that we can try and be competitive and provide for the growth that we have already identified as coming and address the infrastructure needs we know we have."

All results are unofficial until canvassed.

Visit our online Voter Guide for all local election results in your community.