Log in

Opinion

A question on fiscal discipline in Paradise Valley

OPINION — In 1980, the Arizona Legislature gave citizens a powerful say in how their local governments grow and spend monies, and that is a very good thing.

Proposition 426 asks you to permanently increase Paradise Valley’s annual expenditure limitation by roughly $20 million, more than a 40% increase over the current budget in spending capacity. I am recommending a no vote. This is not a vote against infrastructure, public safety, responsible municipal services or hiring staff, but in support of fiscal discipline.

The town says Proposition 426 would not raise taxes. True, because we don’t have local taxes to raise. But it misleads the voter and misses the point completely. A spending limit exists for a reason: to impose fiscal discipline and force elected officials to establish priorities. The expenditure limit isn’t the enemy of good government, it’s a safeguard that helps make good government accountable.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in