West Valley residents are voicing their opposition to a proposed housing and industrial development near them that is seeking annexation into Glendale.
The residents protested the development in …
You must be a member to read this story.
Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here
Otherwise, follow the link below to join.
To Our Valued Readers –
Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.
For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.
Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.
Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.
West Valley residents are voicing their opposition to a proposed housing and industrial development near them that is seeking annexation into Glendale.
The residents protested the development in written statements read at a Glendale City Council meeting last week chiefly because they believe the houses will be packed too densely to blend in with the surrounding neighborhoods and because it will create a Glendale city island surrounded by county land. Both concerns had been voiced by Glendale Council members in prior discussions of the proposed annexation.
Eight comments were read into the record from individuals or groups from the neighborhoods surrounding the property, on either county land or from Litchfield Park — some of the addresses around the property have the 85340 Litchfield Park ZIP code but are not actually part of the city about 4 miles east of the involved area.
If annexed into Glendale, the 865-acres Allen Ranches property northwest of Loop 303 and Camelback Road would be the second-largest addition to the city in 25 years. However, the property is causing more hesitancy on City Council than most annexations. The city has already annexed 412 acres this year with little to no pushback from Council members.
Glendale’s Planning Commission will review proposed general plan and zoning changes regarding the property Thursday, June 4 and Glendale City Council is scheduled to review the general plan, zoning changes and vote on whether to annex the property Tuesday, June 23.
Nearly three-quarters of the property, 615 acres, will be used for industrial warehouses or commercial or office use; 250 acres will be used for a housing development, but that section is causing most of the controversy.
Up-to-date plans showing just how dense the Allen Ranches developers plan to place their houses have not yet been released, but letter writers who attended neighborhood meetings claimed the proposed density was denser than what the county had zoned for the property in 2016, which most neighbors felt had been a fair compromise.
“Using the PAD designation to set aside the 2016 rezoning agreement disrespects and disenfranchises existing property owners,” wrote homeowners association in the nearby Montana Farms neighborhood, on county land northwest of the proposed development.
Many letter-writers lamented that they have no voting power in Glendale yet can be affected by its Council’s decisions regarding property near them.
Council members concerns about the annexation have centered around the density of its homes and creating a “city island” community of residents surrounding mostly by county land, miles away from the city and from most city services.
“You’re going to be generating 3,000 residents, probably at least, maybe more, that are completely detached from the city public safety and city services,” said Cholla District Councilwoman Lauren Tolmachoff in a March Council meeting. “So, I’m not excited about the residential either.”
Residents in the area oppose the development for the same reason.
The Montana Farms HOA wrote to Glendale Council to voice the group’s unanimous opposition, saying the development “would place high-density, entry-level homes across the street from high-end homes on much larger lots.”
The HOA said these higher-density homes would lead to more rental properties, higher residential turnover rates, higher crime, increased tractor trailer traffic near neighborhoods, increased traffic congestion, increased light pollution, would negatively impact area schools.
Vice Mayor Joyce Clark, who represents the Yucca District that this property would be added to if annexed, and some others on Council didn’t like the idea of adding any homes to the city.
“Council’s goal is to encourage and promote job opportunities in our ‘New Frontier.’ I am not pleased to see this applicant come in with a mix of industrial and residential,” she said.
Ms. Clark asked staff to explore the option of adding only the industrial portion of the Allen Ranches property and excluding the residential portion.
Mark Carlisle Associate Editor | Daily Independent @mwcarlisle
Mark is passionate about accurately informing his readers to what is happening in their community. He also loves reading and writing about sports.
Mark has worked for Independent Newsmedia for five years. He married his high school sweetheart, adopted a boxer mix, and awaits his first child.
By 
