Log in

2026 Elections

Arizona Supreme Court rejects challenge to Bobbi Buchli’s Gilbert council ballot petitions

Posted

The Arizona Supreme Court has rejected a legal challenge seeking to remove Bobbi Buchli from the 2026 Gilbert Town Council primary election ballot, affirming a lower court ruling that found her nomination petitions substantially complied with Arizona law.

In a decision order filed May 4, the court ruled that challenger Maureen Hoppe, a Gilbert resident, failed to show that wording issues in Buchli’s petition captions were serious enough to invalidate the signatures she collected.

The case centered on two alleged flaws in the wording of Buchli’s nomination petitions. One version of the petitions described the political division as “LD 14 Town of Gilbert,” while another referred to the election simply as the “2026 election” rather than specifically identifying it as a primary election.

Hoppe argued the reference to Legislative District 14 could confuse voters who live in the legislative district but outside Gilbert town limits into believing they were eligible to sign the petitions. She also argued that failing to specifically use the word “primary” could mislead voters about what election the signatures supported.

The court rejected both arguments.

The justices said Hoppe did not identify any signatures from voters outside Gilbert and therefore failed to demonstrate the wording affected the validity of the petition results. The ruling also noted  any ambiguity was clarified because the petitions clearly identified the office being sought as “Gilbert Town Council.”

On the second issue, the court found there was no clear legislative requirement mandating that petitions specifically use the words “primary” or “general” in that blank on the form. The court also pointed out the petitions correctly listed the date of the primary election, which it said would prevent confusion for voters reading the full caption.

The ruling emphasized Arizona courts’ longstanding standard of “substantial compliance” in election cases, stating candidates should not be removed from the ballot for “mere technical departures from the form.”

In a statement to the Gilbert Independent following the ruling, Buchli said she was pleased with the appellate court’s decision and said her campaign worked “carefully, responsibly, and in good faith to comply with all election requirements.”

She also thanked volunteers and supporters who participated in the petition process and said election challenges, while difficult, are part of the democratic process.

“My focus remains where it has always been — serving the residents of Gilbert and continuing conversations about the future of our community,” Buchli said, citing issues including public safety, responsible growth, water sustainability, economic development and quality of life.

Buchli said she looks forward to continuing “a positive and issues-focused campaign” in the coming months.

The decision affirmed the Maricopa County Superior Court’s earlier ruling in Buchli’s favor and ordered the mandate to issue immediately.

Please submit comments at yourvalley.net/letters or email them to AzOpinions@iniusa.org. We are committed to publishing a wide variety of reader opinions, as long as they meet our Civility Guidelines. Tom Blodgett can be reached by email at tblodgett@iniusa.org or follow him on X at @sp_blodgett.

Bobbi Buchli, Gilbert Town Council, Arizona Supreme Court, Gilbert election, nomination petitions, Maureen Hoppe, Gilbert ballot challenge, Gilbert primary election, Arizona election law, Maricopa County Superior Court

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here