Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.
For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.
Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.
Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
Register to comment
Click here create a free account for posting comments.
Note that free accounts do not include access to premium content on this site.
I am anchor
SHADY PARK
Tempe bar wins round in court against Mirabella at ASU
(ASU/Charlie Leight)
Mirabella at ASU
Posted
INDEPENDENT NEWSMEDIA
An appellate judge has sided with Shady Park in a ruling that sends the concert venue’s dispute with Mirabella at ASU back to superior court.
The Arizona Appeals Court judge cited the First Amendment in vacating the lower court’s injunction regarding time and decibel restrictions at the downtown Tempe bar.
“The superior court’s injunction burdens more speech than necessary to address the asserted harm,” the appeals court wrote.
Mirabella, a high-rise senior living community, said Shady Park’s concerts generated noise that interrupted residents’ sleep, work, study and conversations.
The preliminary injunction was put in place in April in response to a lawsuit by Mirabella and several residents against Shady Park, which is on East University Drive off Mill Avenue.
The bar asked the court to vacate the injunction on First Amendment grounds, saying it was overbroad, violated principles of separation of powers and contained legally flawed and unworkable enforcement mechanisms.
The appeals court decision said it is not clear “whether or to what extent the court’s imposition of a curfew impacted the other provisions of the injunction.
“We therefore vacate the entire injunction so that the superior court can reconsider its order taking into account Shady Park’s First Amendment argument. Because we vacate based on the First Amendment, we decline to analyze Shady Park’s other arguments.”
In a statement, Mirabella at ASU said the latest opinion “did not challenge the Superior Court’s findings that Shady Park’s outdoor concerts were likely to be found a nuisance at trial.”
Mirabella officials said “the court of appeals simply returned the injunction to the Superior Court to consider a new remedy,” adding the case remains on course for a trial early in 2023.
Shady Park applauded the ruling in a release but said “while today is a good day, sadly, this is not the end of the matter.
“ASU’s retirement home is still litigating to stop the music.”