Log in

Letters

Letters: Top range of city’s best-paid officials is too high

Posted 8/21/23

I just read the Surprise Independent article by Jason Stone, which provides an overview of the annual salaries and stipends for top paid city workers.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Letters

Letters: Top range of city’s best-paid officials is too high

Posted

I just read the Surprise Independent article by Jason Stone [“Wingenroth among top paid city workers,” Aug. 16], which provides an overview of the annual salaries and stipends for top paid city workers.

In a word, I am surprised. If I’m in the minority in seeing these salaries as excessive, so be it, but I hope that’s not the case. My lithmus test is whether Surprise resident taxpayers, who have non government jobs of similar role/responsibility, earn equivalent pay.

Many of us have watched the pay escalation of local government workers and shook our heads in amazement. I have watched this take place in three cities we lived in over the past couple of decades.

The article closes by stating that “the average city of Surprise salary in 2022 was $56,901 and the median was $52,831, and that was 24% below national average and 3% under Arizona state average.” So does this mean we should brace for even higher salaries?

According to the tabulated data, the top 27 earners average $199,153 a year. That is roughly four times the average city employees salary. Not knowing the complete breakdown and number of total workers, it’s hard to say if this seems appropriate but, at first blush, seems disproportionate.

Lastly, and perhaps most important, the article does not cover who is in charge of establishing and approving these salaries? When I see a reference to “govsalaries.com” being used as the reference standard, the “fox in the hen house” immediately comes to mind.