It’s hard to understand why the governor would have vetoed the extension [Re: “Prop. 400 extension is key to growth,” Sept. 14]. Will we get our half cent back if it doesn’t go through? Right?
You must be a member to read this story.
Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here
Otherwise, follow the link below to join.
To Our Valued Readers –
Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.
For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.
Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.
Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.
I’m struggling with page 1 with regards to interchange of Litchfield Road and the 303? Litchfield ends at Grand. How was it presented to interchange with the 303?
We live in the area of the 303, Grand and 163rd. This is an absolute nightmare. The off ramp from 303 is a joke for two major highways. Then three lanes to two, back to three, etc. Several accidents witnessed here. You have no idea of how many more houses are going in off of 163rd. Another city of Surprise expansion with no preplanning.
I don’t recall how the Bell bridge over the tracks and Grand was funded, but that was a masterpiece.
Perhaps we can put EV charging stations in here and use some of the federal $77 million granted instead for day-to-day problems not ideology.
