Log in

Opinions

Letters: Let’s not celebrate a superintendent who stayed 1 year

Posted 6/6/23

Dysart Unified School District Superintendent Jim Dean leaving after such a short stay at the helm should not be celebrated but instead be penalized.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Opinions

Letters: Let’s not celebrate a superintendent who stayed 1 year

Posted

Dysart Unified School District Superintendent Jim Dean leaving after such a short stay at the helm should not be celebrated but instead be penalized.

While he may have done an excellent job for the few months and his previous asstistant superintendent job, this is something that the DUSD Governing Board should have known he was a key member of the AIA Board and what his longevity and career commitments would be before offering him the superintendent job.

Why was this not known and a penalty clause inserted into the contract?

The previous superintendent was outrageously paid and in my opinion with leave buyback was making over $300,000 per year.

While a superintendent is important, they are not an island onto themselves or a mayor of their own fiefdom, ie DUSD. They instead must be paid in the range of $120,000 salary and another 50,000 in benefits, including what DUSD pays into the superintendent AZ state retirement fund and their vacation.