Court: U.S. can't target reporters at Portland protests

Posted 10/12/20

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — In a split opinion, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has restored a court injunction that bans federal law enforcement from using force, threats or dispersal orders …

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, subscribers will receive unlimited access to the website, including access to our Daily Independent e-edition, which features Arizona-specific journalism and items you can’t find in our community print products, such as weather reports, comics, crossword puzzles, advice columns and so much more six days a week.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Court: U.S. can't target reporters at Portland protests

Posted

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — In a split opinion, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has restored a court injunction that bans federal law enforcement from using force, threats or dispersal orders against journalists and legal observers who are working at protests in Portland, Oregon.

The 2-1 ruling issued Friday restores an injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael H. Simon. That injunction was put on hold when the Trump administration challenged Simon's order. The ruling by the 9th Circuit restores the ban while it considers the U.S. government's appeal.

The federal agencies “assert a very important public interest, but the record fully supports the district court’s conclusion that the Federal Defendants’ interest does not require dispersing plaintiffs,” according to the majority opinion. “They have not threatened federal property, and the journalists, in particular, provide a vitally important service to the public.”

The Justice Department did not immediately comment on the ruling.

The ACLU of Oregon, which filed the initial class-action lawsuit on behalf of journalists and legal observers, applauded the news.

“This is a crucial victory for civil liberties and the freedom of the press, which are critical to the functioning of our democracy. The court’s opinion affirms that the government cannot use violence to control the narrative about what is happening at these historic protests," said attorney Matthew Borden.

The lawsuit included affidavits from journalists, including a freelance photographer for the Associated Press, and legal observers who had been shot by federal officers with non-lethal munitions.

The Trump administration sent federal agents from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to Portland this summer to help quell racial injustice protests that were increasingly targeting the Mark O. Hatfield Courthouse and other federal property.

The presence of the U.S. agents prompted thousands of residents to show up at protests.

Multiple journalists and photographers said they were targeted with tear gas, flash-bang grenades and pepper spray as they tried to document the unrest.

Comments