Committee finalizes draft Arizona legislative, congressional district maps

Public input is next in what could still alter lines

Posted 10/29/21

PHOENIX — Despite concerns of Democrats on the panel, the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission on Thursday gave preliminary approval to a map that would give Republicans an edge in …

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Committee finalizes draft Arizona legislative, congressional district maps

Public input is next in what could still alter lines


PHOENIX — Despite concerns of Democrats on the panel, the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission on Thursday gave preliminary approval to a map that would give Republicans an edge in electing members of the legislature for the balance of the decade.

And at least part of that is because they voted to create a legislative district in Pima County designed to help ensure the election of Republicans to the state House and Senate.

There was less controversy over a decision to give final approval to draft maps that also would give Republicans an edge in congressional races for the balance of the decade.
As crafted, Republicans would dominate three districts and Democrats in two. And the margins are close enough in the other four to, at least theoretically, allow a candidate from either party to win a general election.

But even with Thursday’s vote, that is not the final word. Commissioners said they anticipate changes in early December after that map goes out for public comment for the next 30 days.

One issue left hanging is how that map splits Tucson between two congressional districts following a complaint from Mayor Regina Romero. She said it makes no sense to have the University of Arizona and the nearby Fourth Avenue shopping and restaurant area separated from downtown.

“She makes a compelling argument,” said Chairwoman Erika Neuberg.

But rather than wrestle with the issue Thursday, the commission chose to keep that line in place, at least for now, with the option of making future changes before final adoption.

The real debate Thursday came over how to draw the lines for the state’s 30 legislative districts, with the Republican and Democratic commissioners on opposite sides of the key battle of how to divide Southern Arizona.

Neuberg sided with the two Republicans in saying she prefers a plan that allows what she called “right-of-center” residents in the Tucson area to have some chance to elect someone who shares their political philosophy.

But in doing so, the commission rejected a proposal by Shereen Lerner, one of the two Democrats, to create a district with a population split nearly even between the two major parties. She argued that was fair.

“It provides Republicans with a good opportunity to have their voices heard,” Lerner said.

The maps, which now go out for public comment, for the moment create two legislative districts where a study of how residents of the area voted in prior elections make them an effective tossup. Another four districts are considered within the possible competitive range, with two leaning Republican and two leaning Democrat.

There would have been three tossup districts, with 12 where the margins favor Republicans and 11 with decidedly Democratic edges.

But that was before the panel crafted LD 17 — the one in the suburban Tucson area — to give an edge to the GOP. Hence, the draft maps appear to create 13 Republican-leaning districts against 11 with a Democratic edge.

The commission did that by crafting a district that starts at Marana, runs through Oro Valley and around Tucson’s northern and eastern edge to take in Tanque Verde and Vail. That drew objections from Shereen Lerner, one of the two Democrats on the panel.

She proposed instead to include Casas Adobes in the district, saying that makes more sense.

“They share a lot of services in that area,” Lerner said. It also would have kept most of the Amphitheater and Catalina Foothills school districts in the same political area.

That did not sit well with Commissioner David Mehl.
He agreed to back off — but just a bit — from the plan he previously advanced on behalf of the Southern Arizona Leadership Council, of which he is a founding member.

His earlier plan included Oracle, Mammoth and San Manuel in LD 17. They now are in LD 7, which stretches north through Florence into the eastern edge of Apache Junction and up to Payson and Snowflake.

And the Flowing Wells area was moved from LD 17 into LD 20, which runs through downtown Tucson.
But Mehl insisted with four strongly Democratic districts in Pima County there needs to be at least one with a Republican edge.

“Having a district that leans Republican I don’t think is a bad thing,” he said.

Anyway, Mehl argued, this plan creates a “suburban ring around Tucson.”

He said it also reflects that Tanque Verde residents are in many ways like those living in the city’s northern suburbs. Mehl said they have no interest in being aligned with people living in Tucson, saying they have repeatedly rejected annexation.

He got the support of Douglas York, the other Republican on the panel, who said it makes sense to have Vail and Tanque Verde linked to the northwest section of the county.

“The east side of Pima County is a lot like the Marana area,” he said.

Lerner said her GOP colleagues were ignoring one requirement they have for drawing lines: creating compact districts.

“Casas Adobes, it’s right there,” she said. “We’re going around it for political reasons.”

What tilted the debate in Mehl’s favor was the support of Neuberg, the lone independent on the commission.

“I am focused on ensuring some accountability in the Tucson area for right-of-center folks, a community of interest, to not be neglected,” she said.

The result is that LD 17 has a Republican edge, versus what would have been a nearly even political split under Lerner’s plan.

That question of what the area around Tucson should look like legislatively spilled over into a separate debate over the political future of southern Cochise County, specifically Bisbee and Douglas.

“These are border communities that have high Latino populations,” said Lerner.

But the map given preliminary approval Thursday puts them into heavily Republican LD 19, which includes not just the rest of Cochise County but goes as far west as Green Valley and stretches to Safford, Clifton and Morenci.

Lerner wants those areas linked to LD 21, a heavily Democratic district that runs from Nogales up into southeast Tucson.

The problem is the law requires each of the 30 legislative districts to have roughly equal number of residents. And removing the populations of Bisbee and Douglas would leave LD 19 short.

Lerner said there’s a simple way to solve that: Add Vail and Tanque to LD 19. But that drew objections from Mehl, who said he doesn’t want to give up those Republican voters from LD 17.

Strictly speaking, what Lerner wants is not dead, as the maps can still be changed before formal adoption next month. She promised to bring the issue back before a final vote.


No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here