Log in

Arizona set to increase unemployment benefits, with conditions

Boost likely wouldn't come until next year, cut eligible weeks

Posted 5/19/21

PHOENIX — Arizona's unemployed are going to have to wait at least a year to see an increase in benefits.

And even then they may not get them.

A deal negotiated between Gov. Doug Ducey and …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Arizona set to increase unemployment benefits, with conditions

Boost likely wouldn't come until next year, cut eligible weeks

Posted

PHOENIX — Arizona's unemployed are going to have to wait at least a year to see an increase in benefits.

And even then they may not get them.

A deal negotiated between Gov. Doug Ducey and legislative leaders includes a plan to boost the maximum benefit by $80 a week, to $320. That would be the first increase in 17 years.

It also would raise Arizona from having the second-lowest cap in the nation, with only Mississippi lower.

But unlike a plan already approved by the Senate, it would not take effect this year. That's because it is contingent on several things happening — all of which are designed to financially shield employers.

First, it is contingent on an employer-financed trust fund that pays for those benefits reaching $1.1 billion. That's where it was before the COVID-induced recession and jump in unemployment rates.

The fund effectively went broke this year and only remains in positive territory because it was bailed out when the state put millions of tax dollars into the account. With the number of unemployed dropping, it now stands at about $337 million.

That, however, goes to the next trigger.

Under the deal, the state unemployment rate has to be at least 5% or less before the benefits would increase.

It peaked at 14.2% and is currently at 6.7%. More to the point, the last time it was at 5% was four years ago.

Third, once the benefits actually go up, the maximum number of weeks someone could collect will drop by two, to 24 weeks.

And regardless of anything else, the earliest Arizonans would be able to collect higher benefits is July 1, 2022.

All that is designed to protect employers.

Unemployment benefits are supposed to be a safety net for those who are fired or laid off through no fault of their own.

By law, those benefits are supposed to equal half of what someone was earning. But that has been subject to a cap of $240.

The issue of protecting employers stems from the fact that those payments are financed by a tax that they pay on the first $7,000 of each worker's salary.

What employers actually pay in taxes is based on how often a company lays off workers, with current rates of less than 1% to more than 13%. The Department of Economic Security estimates the average tax rate is in the 2.3% range, meaning about $160 per worker.

Matt Gress, the governor's chief economic adviser, said all the triggers — and the delayed date to get the fund replenished — is to ensure employers don't end up paying more, at least not now while they are still recovering economically.

"The employer tax rate is set by the amount of money in the trust fund,'' he said. "So the more that's in the trust fund, the less employers have to contribute.''

Mr. Gress figures the delay, coupled with a healthy trust fund and other limits, would result in a 1.4% tax average rate — but with a twist: Employers would pay that on the first $8,000 of each worker's salary, or just $112 a year.

The deal does include a sweetener of sorts.

Under current law, any earnings of more than $30 a week are deducted from benefits. The new proposal would set that figure at $160 before benefits are reduced, essentially allowing and encouraging people to accept part-time work.