Opinion

Stratton: Bad policy in Scottsdale’s general plan can have property tax implications later

Posted 10/19/21

Ballots have arrived asking for your vote on whether to approve or deny the 2035 General Plan.

For the fiscal health and wellbeing of the city of Scottsdale, I urge you to vote no on the plan. …

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Opinion

Stratton: Bad policy in Scottsdale’s general plan can have property tax implications later

Posted

Ballots have arrived asking for your vote on whether to approve or deny the 2035 General Plan.

For the fiscal health and wellbeing of the city of Scottsdale, I urge you to vote no on the plan.

There are many opinions on this plan and the spirited community debate is good to see. I only wish it had been more prevalent at the City Council level. I have been calling out this plan from the beginning for its bad fiscal implications, as well as its bad effects on property values in Scottsdale. It is nice to see some on council finally coming around to the same conclusion.

Councilmembers Solange Whitehead and Betty Janik have stated this plan doesn’t raise your taxes. They are wrong and these statements demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of municipal finance.

Bad land use policies and policies that reduce property values and cost the city of Scottsdale revenue in the form of reduced sales and property taxes can cripple the city’s budget. When that happens, the dollars to support our great amenities and public safety budget will have to come from somewhere, and that somewhere is an increase in your taxes.

Don’t be fooled by their lack of vision and leadership. These issues are tied directly to the fiscal health and wellbeing of the city and this plan creates significant long term fiscal challenges.

Bad land use policy results in bad fiscal policy. Good land use policy protects our community and allows us to maximize property tax revenues, make smart budgeting decisions, and enhance our underlying tourism and retail base.

This plan does none of these things. It fails to protect our critical tourism industry and it says nothing about the short-term vacation rental crisis that is ruining Scottsdale neighborhoods and stealing tax revenues from our legitimate hotels and resorts.

This plan does not reflect the high standards of our community. Vote no on the 2035 General Plan. We need leaders with vision on City Council who see the big picture of their decisions and understand the result of bad policy.

Scottsdale has a budget of $2.75 billion. It needs to be ran as such, and not like an HOA. Every decision that is made should be made through the lens of sound fiscal policy. Vote no.

Editor’s Note: Tim Stratton is seeking candidacy to run for a seat on Scottsdale City Council in the Nov. 8, 2022 general election. He is a longtime Scottsdale resident, attorney, and currently serves as a member of the state board of charter schools.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here