Log in

ETHICS COMPLAINT

Ethics complaint against Scottsdale City Council Member Barry Graham advances to May 8 hearing

Posted 4/18/25

Scottsdale City Council Member Barry Graham has filed a motion to dismiss the ethics complaint against him, which the review panel will decide on May 8.

Graham has been accused by resident Laura …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
ETHICS COMPLAINT

Ethics complaint against Scottsdale City Council Member Barry Graham advances to May 8 hearing

Posted

Scottsdale City Council Member Barry Graham has filed a motion to dismiss the ethics complaint against him, which the review panel will decide on May 8.

Graham has been accused by resident Laura Norton of going against the city charter by directing staff to pause funding for a $3 million project to build a sidewalk on 68th Street between the Arizona Canal and Camelback Road based on a series of emails by city staff.

Graham has expressed his preference on the Scottsdale Independent’s Facebook page to spend the money on potholes instead of the sidewalk.
At the crux of the case is whether Graham “ordered” or “requested” funding to stop or if he simply said to City Treasurer Sonia Andrews that he didn’t like the project.

Graham has said all along that the complaint is only a politically motivated attack against him.

An attorney for the ethics review panel will interview city staff and report his findings by April 25, which gives attorneys on both sides time to prepare arguments to be made on May 8.

Scottsdale, Barry Graham, Ethics Complaint

Share with others