PHOENIX - The way a Scottsdale lawmaker sees it, the words are written on every bill and should be obeyed.
No, not "In God We Trust.''
It is: "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private.''
And Rep. Joseph Chaplik, R-Scottsdale, wants to be sure that Arizonans don't get turned away from businesses in the state because they want to use that "legal tender'' to pay.
His HB 2555, awaiting action by the full House, would spell out in law that any business with a physical location in Arizona "must accept cash as a payment for goods and services.'' And it also spells out that consumers with cash cannot be charged a penalty.
Lawmakers from Mesa and Phoenix from both parties like the idea, unlike the Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce whose lobbyist said it would place an unnecessary burden on businesses.
Cesar Aguilar, D-Phoenix, recalled as a "broke college kid'' not being able to pay cash for his rent. In fact, he said, the only way to pay the rent was to log into a web portal which charged an additional fee to use a credit or debit card.
"I am in strong support of this bill and think it's a pretty good bill,'' Aguilar said.
Rep. Justin Heap, R-Mesa, spoke of his time working in construction along with Hispanics.
"I know a lot of them were operating on cash only,'' he said.
"I don't know how those people function in a cashless society,'' Heap said. "And I don't feel there should be any burden on them to go to banks and get debit cards if they don't want to when, as Mr. Chaplik pointed out, the cash states on it that it is for every debt, both private and public.''
The measure comes with teeth. Customers whose cash is refused can seek civil damages of $1,000 a day from the errant merchant.
There have been moves away from cash since the COVID outbreak, with some merchants loath to accept folding money and the viruses that they fear they might carry.
Chaplik scoffed at that logic, saying there's no more chance of transmission of disease from cash as there is from pressing the buttons on a device that accepts credit and debit cards for payment, or even at an automated teller machine.
Instead, he said the issue is that there are people who, for whatever reason, only operate with cash.
That, Chaplik said, includes about 6 million people who are "unbanked,'' meaning they have no relationship at all with a financial institution.
"This helps those individuals that live paycheck-to-paycheck and cash their checks,'' he said. And Chaplik said that includes 11% of Blacks and 9% of Hispanics.
And there's something else. Purchases made with cash are more private, with no credit card or other record to show where someone has spent his or her money.
The lone person to testify against the measure when it was heard earlier this week in the House Commerce Committee was Mike Huckins, lobbyist for the Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce. He described the measure as an unacceptable mandate on business.
"While we understand that some people prefer to use cash, it's our position that businesses should be free to take the form of payment that best suits their individual business model and/or needs,'' Huckins told lawmakers.
"There are many reasons why businesses may choose not to accept cash payment, including operational efficiencies, less risk of robbery or accepting counterfeit bills,'' he said.
And Huckins said a requirement to accept cash could have outside impacts on small businesses that may not have the time or staff to make it to the bank on a daily basis.
The Federal Reserve - the folks who print out all those bills with the "legal tender'' verbiage - says there is no federal law mandating that any person, private business or organization must accept their currency or even coins from the U.S. Mint.
"Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law that says otherwise,'' the agency says.
Some states already do, including Massachusetts, Colorado and Delaware. And some cities, like San Francisco, New York and Philadelphia have adopted similar local ordinances.
That didn't impress Huckins who said they are "all great cities but would not like their regulatory burdens put on us here in Arizona.''
We’d like to invite our readers to submit their civil comments, pro or con, on this issue. Email AZOpinions@iniusa.org.