Log in

Community

Three Goodyear ballot measures failing in city elections

Three of Goodyear's four ballot questions appeared headed for a defeat while a fourth one had voters split nearly evenly.

On a fifth ballot question, voters gave wide approval to a new franchise …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor
Community

Three Goodyear ballot measures failing in city elections

Posted

Three of Goodyear's four ballot questions appeared headed for a defeat while a fourth one had voters split nearly evenly.

In two other ballot question, voters gave wide approval to a new franchise agreement with EPCOR Utilities  and Liberty Utilities in the returns reported Tuesday night via the Maricopa County Recorder's Office.

The results will not be finalized until the vote is canvassed and approved by council.

On the ballot were four proposed changes to the city charter ranging from how the city viewed development changes to how council received pay raises.

Here's a look at the measures and the vote total:

Question 1: Would have enshrined the ability of council to make changes in land use and zoning into the city charter if approved. Yes votes were 5,543, or about 48.7%, and no votes were 5,831, or about 51.3%.

Question 2: Would have changed the charter to allow the city's Compensation Committee to make recommendations on salary for council to be passed by a majority council vote. Yes votes were 4,720, or about 41.6%, and no votes were 6,630, or about 58.4%. That result would mean the committee could recommend up to a 5.1% raise to be approved by council, but anything larger would have to go to a public vote.

Question 3: Would have given the city manager the ability to change and create city departments, a power currently vested with the council. Yes votes were 4,848, or about 42.7%, and no votes were 6,508, or about 57.3%. Currently only council can create or change departments.

Question 4: Would list the sources of city revenue in the charter as well as reinforce rules for bond spending. Yes votes were 5,505, or about 50.9%, and no votes were 5,322, or about 49.1%.

The fifth question was regarding the EPCOR franchise agreement, which saw 57% of voters opting to approve. The sixth question for Liberty's franchise agreement saw 60.3% approve.

Turnout for the all-mail city election was about 17.1%.

Share with others