Prop 207 a sensible, workable approach to marijuana legalization

Posted 10/1/20

Prop 207, The Smart and Safe Arizona Act, is a responsible marijuana legalization plan that makes sense to this Arizona conservative.

This story requires a subscription for $5.99/month.
Already a subscriber? Log in to continue. Otherwise, click here to subscribe.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in

Subscribe to our e-newsletter for continued access

Free newsletter subscribers to the Daily Independent can enjoy free access to our AP stories, Capital Media Services, earned media and special contributors on our Opinions with Civility pages. If you aren’t a free newsletter subscriber yet, join now and continue accessing more content. This does not include our exclusive content written by the newsroom. We hope you’ll consider supporting our journalism.

I am anchor

Prop 207 a sensible, workable approach to marijuana legalization


Prop 207, The Smart and Safe Arizona Act, is a responsible marijuana legalization plan that makes sense to this Arizona conservative.

As marijuana legalization becomes more and more inevitable, we have an opportunity to get legalization right.

Prop 207 legalizes marijuana under careful safeguards, and at the same time will increase tax revenues and generate good paying jobs. It also provides for stronger penalties for those who use marijuana and drive impaired. The measure also ensures that marijuana is not marketed to children, that edibles are not made to resemble children’s candy, and that levels of THC in edibles are limited to prevent someone from ingesting too much. There’s also a provision that prohibits smoking marijuana in public places.

These are commonsense provisions that make sense.

Prop 207 comes along at the right time. As the pandemic reduces revenues and increases costs for government, this measure will generate $300 million a year in additional tax revenues.

Money would be targeted toward public safety, community colleges, substance abuse treatment, mental health programs, road and freeway construction, just to name a few. And countess new jobs would be created at a time when they are needed.

As a conservative, I am not a fan of taxes. Prop 207 is essentially a voluntary tax that could help prevent increases in so-called “involuntary” taxes on income and property.

None of the arguments against marijuana can withstand any serious examination.

The organized opposition to marijuana is generally led by people who have spent their professional life in government. One of the first things they say is that people don’t really go to jail for simple possession. This begs the question of why we need harsh criminal penalties for marijuana possession if they are not used anyway. But even worse, this claim by the critics of marijuana is clearly false.

As a prosecutor, I saw plenty of people prosecuted harshly for these types of offenses. And recently, Arizonan Rodney Jones spent over two years in prison for possession of 0.05 of an ounce of hashish, even though he had a valid medical marijuana card, bought the product from a state-licensed dispensary, and was a non-repetitive “offender.”

So much for the argument that nonviolent, non-repeat possessors of marijuana for personal use don’t go to prison. And in Mr. Jones’ case, he was not an “offender” at all — he was legally entitled to possess the marijuana, as the Arizona Supreme Court ruled unanimously in overturning his conviction.

It is no coincidence that one of the most high profile opponents of Proposition 207, Yavapai County Attorney Sheila Polk, prosecuted Mr. Jones. Preventing this perversion of justice, perpetrated by the government, is reason enough to vote for Prop 207. The Supreme Court ruling in favor of Mr. Jones belatedly put an end to an embarrassing episode for Arizona, and I personally never want to see anything like that happen again.

Besides, with rising violent crime, law enforcement has better things to do than to prosecute nonviolent marijuana users.

Marijuana opponents also regularly trot out “the children” as a reason to vote no. This is largely an appeal to emotion rather than a real argument. As a father of three myself, marijuana is very low on my list of concerns.

A much more serious concern are opioids, which are far easier to obtain than marijuana. In fact, it is extraordinarily difficult for a minor to secure marijuana from a legal dispensary. And Prop 207 contains tough packaging and warning label requirements.

Arguments that marijuana would be a problem in the workforce don’t hold any water either. Under Prop 207, employers and property owners can ban marijuana use at their workplaces or on their property. Drug tests would still be permitted allowing employers to make sure their employees are not impaired, just as such tests are used today for marijuana and other drugs, including alcohol.

Prop 207 effectively tackles the challenge of implementing legalization in a responsible manner. Legalization is coming one way or another.

We have an opportunity to get it right, to end injustices that result from the law’s treatment of simple possession of any amount of marijuana as a felony, and to make sure children are protected and tax dollars are spent wisely. If we miss this opportunity more radical elements may push legalization without important safeguards.

Or worse yet, politicians and bureaucrats may attempt legalization without consulting voters.

Please vote "yes" on Prop 207.

Tim La Sota is a lifelong Republican, former prosecutor with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, and former general counsel for the Arizona Republican Party.


No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here